How many members of the Bush administration does it take to change a light bulb? - book insider secrets to become a plus size model
1. One to deny that the lamps must be changed;
2. An attack on the patriotism of those who say that the light bulb needs changing;
3. Nobody blame Clinton for burning the lamp;
4. One to arrange the invasion of a country that rumors of a cache of light bulbs;
5. One to one billion U.S. dollar offer without a contract, Halliburton for the new lamp;
6. One to arrange a photo of Bush, dressed as a janitor, stood on a ladder under the banner: Light Bulb makes the change;
7. One administration insider to resign and write a book documenting in detail how Bush was literally in the dark;
8. A viciously smear # 7;
9. A replacement for the campaign on television and at rallies, as George W. Bush had a strong light bulb changing policy;
10. And finally one to confuse Americans about the difference between screwing a light bulb and screwing the country.
Fact or fiction?
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Book Insider Secrets To Become A Plus Size Model How Many Members Of The Bush Administration Does It Take To Change A Light Bulb?
17 comments:
If President Bush is with his history of setting the agenda for discussion on current issues, which without a doubt that the bulb be changed must be recognized in line. I am with a speech that somewhere called to the urgent need to change the bulb, the country, motivated and, especially, to their side on. Instinctively, the D-mark heavily on the recommendation of President Bush, in contrast to the bulb change and vomit many reasons for the opposition lame. Finally, as Bush tries to get the ball changed, but in the process, you need to look on the mark again rediculously bad in the eyes of the country, against the lighting is necessary and urgent. ... What a clever boy Buuush dat! ~ ~ ~
Very true, I agree with all instructions.
Bush has done horible ...
None. They are all so bright and lit a light bulb would be superfluous.
Done! The tragedy of a series of humorous responses.
But he forgot the first person to add - a person who accidentally shot pellets and the ball was, then the claims of the lamp in the wrong place.
The facts are simply the fiction told with an excess of sincerity.
It can not happen here.
LOL, that was very good. And some details.
God, I want to cut and paste! I?
taking into account all the above. if everything had learned from the bulb is not burned, they forgot to turn it on. ( "Cheney !!!!....")
How did you know that my lamp is broken ... Sincerely: Bush ...
Good question - better answers. A light bulb to identify "someone with an" idea ", and so nobody in the Bush government are not able to change a lightbulb? Today, we sell the great seaports of the United States by Arabs? This bulb is completely broken and can not be changed!
Good question - better answers. A light bulb to identify "someone with an" idea ", and so nobody in the Bush government are not able to change a lightbulb? Today, we sell the great seaports of the United States by Arabs? This bulb is completely broken and can not be changed!
LOL sad but true, particularly in Haliburton.
How true. Note that the lamp has never been changed. Addressing Has anyone else?
"I understand that the bulbs, this lamp. Has done an outstanding job in its mission to bring light into the world so that terrorists hide in the shadows. Why the change? On behind the bulb and I am awarding the Medal of Freedom for his fight against the dark forces of evil. "
Yes, but how long are you in this puzzle?
Funny! There are tears on my face Comin Laughin so hard.
He is more "dark" in the White House.
In fact, it is a very complicated issue to be taken on the path of democracy. The bulb must be analyzed to determine whether it requires government intervention cost millions of dollars to taxpayers. So when government intervention is needed is a government agency created in order to analyze the most profitable for the taxpayer that can be done at the expense of millions of dollars for taxpayers. Then: organization must carry out the highest potential contractors to work to change the ball as profitable to the taxpayer at a cost of millions of taxpayer dollars for the phases of production bids. If the contractor on behalf of the taxpayer's duty was to be rented through the work of America now be invloved. Therefore, to deny, to the detriment of millions of taxpayers by the Bush administration has can be no participation in the development of the bulb and can all disputes, the disadvantages, too. Therefore, the answer is zero, the members of the Bush administration will be for changing the light bulb is involved. What is really great for tthat taxpayers, because the officials are not able to change a light Blub, and they screwed up that could have cost the taxpayers billions of dollars. So we can sleep easy knowing that the Bush administration, the taxation of saving billions of dollars of American taxpayers.
Post a Comment